MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409519036 · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaf069

Genomic Exploration of Climate-driven Evolution and Evolutionary Convergence in Forest Pathogens

2025· article· en· W4409519036 on OpenAlexafffund
Pauline Hessenauer, Nicolas Feau, Renate Heinzelmann, Richard C. Hamelin

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology and Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Forest ServiceUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGenome CanadaOhio State UniversityGénome QuébecOregon State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaColorado State UniversityPurdue University
KeywordsBiologyClimate changeVirulenceGenomicsAdaptation (eye)EcologyEvolutionary biologyConvergent evolutionGenomeComparative genomicsGenePhylogeneticsGeneticsNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate significantly influences the distribution, composition, and diversity of fungal communities, impacting the growth, spread, and virulence of fungal forest pathogens. This study employs advanced landscape genomics methods to explore the genomic adaptations of three major fungal pathogens: Those responsible for Dutch elm disease, dothistroma needle blight, and Swiss needle cast. Our findings reveal that precipitation and humidity are primary drivers of adaptation in these species. We use these insights to forecast potential adaptations under future climate scenarios (genomic offset) and identify specific genes and pathways associated with climate responses in each pathogen. Notably, we detect a convergence in moisture adaptation across these distantly related species, particularly in genes related to the cytoskeleton and transporters. This study enhances our understanding of fungal pathogen evolution in response to climate change, offering crucial insights for forest disease management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome Biology and EvolutionSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207