MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409519876 · doi:10.1093/tas/txaf051

Short communication: thermotolerance and residual feed intake in <i>Bos-indicus</i> crossbred beef heifers

2025· article· en· W4409519876 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidual feed intakeCrossbreedAnimal scienceResidualBeef cattleBiologyMathematicsFeed conversion ratioBody weightEndocrinologyAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study investigated the relationship between thermotolerance and residual feed intake (RFI) in Bos indicus crossbred replacement beef heifers. In the summer of 2019, vaginal body temperatures were recorded from 654 heifers to identify the most and the least heat-tolerant animals based on changes in body temperature throughout the day. From this group of heifers, 27 were ranked in the summer as either heat-tolerant (n = 14; thermotolerant) or least heat-tolerant (n = 13; non-thermotolerant) to enroll in a 42-d feed efficiency test conducted in the fall. The maximum body temperature minus the 0700 h body temperature difference between the groups was 0.19 °C for thermotolerant and 1.2 for non-thermotolerant heifers (P &amp;lt; 0.01). In the fall, selected heifers (398 ± 11.3 kg of body weight [BW]; approximately 720 d of age) were randomly allocated into four concrete-floored pens, each with two GrowSafe feed bunks, and fed a common ad libitum total mixed ration (16.9% crude protein, 52% total digestible nutrients on a DM basis) for a 56-d period (14 d of adaptation followed by 42 d of evaluation). Body weight was collected on d -1, 0, 14, 28, 41, and 42, while fall body temperature was recorded (10 min intervals for 4 consecutive d) from d 29 to 32 of the study, using temperature probes placed intravaginally with a hormone-free controlled internal drug release device. Final BW, average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI), DMI as a percentage of BW, RFI, and body temperature were analyzed as a completely randomized design. Final BW, ADG, DMI, and body temperature collected during the feeding period were not affected by thermotolerance phenotype (P ≥ 0.42); however, heifers previously classified as thermotolerant had decreased RFI (P = 0.01; -1.32 vs. 1.27 ± 3.31 kg, respectively) and DMI as a percentage of BW (P = 0.01) when compared with non-thermotolerant heifers. In conclusion, Bos indicus crossbred replacement beef heifers previously classified as thermotolerant based on multiple body temperature measurements collected throughout the summer had decreased RFI when measured in the fall, indicating the potential of feed efficiency in heat-tolerant beef heifers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it