Differences in Clinical Characteristics Between Hand Eczema and Hand Psoriasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Hand eczema and hand psoriasis are common skin conditions that may present with similar clinical features, making differentiation challenging. Objective: This study aims to identify clinical characteristics that distinguish hand eczema from hand psoriasis. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with either condition at the Contact Dermatitis and the Psoriasis Clinic of the Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University—a national tertiary referral center in Thailand—from January 2015 to November 2022. Results: A total of 398 patients with hand eczema and 140 with hand psoriasis were included. Exogenous (76.1%) and endogenous (23.9%) hand eczema showed similar lesion location and morphology. However, compared with hand psoriasis, endogenous hand eczema more commonly involved the palmar area, palmar side of digits, and finger pulps ( P < 0.001). Conversely, hand psoriasis predominantly affected both sides of the wrist, the dorsal side of the hand, nail fold, and the nails ( P < 0.001). Clinical manifestations such as papules, vesicles, scales, and fissures were more frequently observed in endogenous hand eczema, whereas hyperkeratotic plaques were more characteristic of hand psoriasis ( P < 0.001). Itching was significantly more frequent in hand eczema ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: Symptoms, lesion locations, and morphology may provide valuable insights that enhance diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between hand eczema and psoriasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".