MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409526886 · doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101153

Demonstrating the importance of the strategy implementation process to an entire organization

2025· article· en· W4409526886 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganizational Dynamics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess managementProcess (computing)BusinessOperations managementComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues that the essence of strategy implementation is internal alignment among several key areas. The CEO and the senior leadership team must formulate a strategy based on thorough analyses of the macro-environment, the industry structure, and the industry value chain. Once a recommended strategy is developed, the strategy needs to be evaluated in light of the firm’s structure, controls, and rewards. Equally important is to ensure that the organizational culture supports the proposed strategy and that the appropriate leadership is in place. Then, the resources and capabilities using the internal value chain analysis need to be examined to see if each element supports the strategy. Further, the strategy has to meet the test of management preferences. Finally, the senior leadership needs to assess whether the strategy provides the guidance needed for managers and employees to make decisions on a day-to-day basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it