MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409526944 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v15n5p311

Interrogating Hybridity: Approaching Identity Clash in Hanif Kureishi's My Son the Fanatic

2025· article· en· W4409526944 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelnaeim Ibrahim Awad Elaref, Imran Alkhalifah

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHybridityIdentity (music)ArtLiteratureAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the challenges of assimilating strange traditions into one’s identity as depicted in Hanif Kureishi's My Son the Fanatic by analyzing the religious conflicts encountered by Parvez and his son, Ali, as they reconcile their Pakistani heritage with the prevailing British influence and identity challenges. Kureishi's short story illustrates the intricacies of merging many cultures and customs via the characters' experiences and struggles to attain a sense of belonging. The study sheds light on the burden of reconciling cultural identities and the tensions that emerge between personal liberty and societal conventions. Furthermore, it explores the political ramifications of hybridity by emphasizing its importance in transforming identity and culture within a global context. Kureishi employs narrative techniques and symbolic imagery to scrutinize diversity, contesting rigid generalizations and advocating for a nuanced perspective on identity. This study underscores the transforming potential of embracing influences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.015
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207