MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409527614 · doi:10.1161/cir.151.suppl_1.p3156

Abstract P3156: Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic Syndrome Stage Prevalence varies by Asian Subgroup

2025· article· en· W4409527614 on OpenAlexaff
Sukhmeet S. Sachal, Kun Chen, T. Yan, Purnima Bharath, Lester Andrew Uy, Armaan Jamal, Malathi Srinivasan, Nitya Rajeshuni, Gloria Kim, Robert J. Huang, Latha Palaniappan, Shiori Kawai, Adrian Matias Bacong, Unjali P. Gujral

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMetabolic syndromeStage (stratigraphy)Internal medicineKidneyKidney diseaseCardiologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cardiovascular Kidney Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome characterizes the interplay of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic disorders with five progressive stages. Prior data have shown that CKM syndrome is lower among aggregated Asian people when compared to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) people. However, when disaggregated, some Asian groups have a greater burden of CKM-related conditions (e.g., diabetes) compared to NHW people. We examined CKM prevalence among Asians compared to NHW people using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Hypothesis: We hypothesize that CKM syndrome prevalence will be higher in Asian subgroups compared to NHWs. Methods: Using 2015-2018 NHIS data, we estimated the prevalence of CKM Stages among Asian Indians, Chinese, and Filipinos compared to NHW people. Variables included obesity, using Asian-specific Body Mass Index (BMI) values, diabetes status, hypertension, cholesterol, and the presence of cardiovascular symptoms to distinguish CKM stages. Kidney function was unavailable in NHIS. Stages were defined as: 0 (BMI <23), 1 (BMI ≥23 or prediabetes), 2/3 (BMI ≥23, prediabetes, hypertension, diabetes, or high cholesterol), or 4 (established cardiovascular disease). Associations between level of physical activity, access to care, socioeconomic status, and CKM stages were tested using bivariate (ANOVA, Pearson’s chi-squared) and regression analysis. Results: We examined 86,762 adults aged 20-80 (mean = 45.8). Prevalence of stages varied by race, with CKM being highest in Chinese (45.7%) for Stage 0, Asian Indians (53.8%) for Stage 1, and Filipinos (29.6%) for Stage 2/3 (Figure 1). The prevalence of CKM in the aforementioned groups was significantly higher compared to NHW, with Stage 0 prevalence being 15.2% higher in Chinese, Stage 1 prevalence being 19.0% among Asian Indians, and Stage 2/3 prevalence being 3.7% higher among Filipinos (Figure 1). Conclusions: When disaggregated, Asian Americans experience a different burden of CKM syndrome when compared to NHW people. Factors such as the prevalence of prediabetes, diabetes, high cholesterol, and higher BMI values undoubtedly contribute to the disparities that are noted. The different burden of CKM stage by race highlights the need for culturally appropriate interventions to reduce racial disparities in CKM syndrome. Further research is warranted on the impact of demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors on CKM in Asian Americans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→