MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409528956 · doi:10.5006/c2003-03322

A New Impinging Jet Device for Corrosion Studies

2003· article· en· W4409528956 on OpenAlexaff
Alebachew Demoz, T. Da̧broś, Kirk H. Michaelian, Sankara Papavinasam, Winston Revie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsDevon Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionMaterials scienceJet (fluid)MetallurgyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new high pressure and temperature submerged impinging jet device is described. The experimental results of its flow characteristics are summarized. Local mass transfers on a Teflon disc normal to the jet with eight 1-mm diameter microelectrodes located at 0 < x/r < 3.8, where x is the distance from the stagnation point on the disc and r is the jet nozzle radius, were measured using the limiting current of potassium ferricyanide solution for 50 ≤ Reynolds number (Re) ≤ 4500 at a jet nozzle exit to disc height, H, to r ratio of 10. Flow transition from laminar to turbulent flow occurred at Re ≈ 800. The empirical relation between the local Sherwood number (Sh) and Re in the stagnation region and developing wall jet region gave two segmented linear correlations. The shear effects of the circular jet on flat carbon steel discs examined after 24 h exposure at Re = 780 showed significantly more material loss at x/r = 2.5. This coincided with the location where the local Sh obtained from the mass transfer measurements began to raise. The device is scalable and can generate a wide range of Re, enabling meaningful laboratory inhibitor and corrosion studies at high shear stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer MechanismsFrench-language works237,207