MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409533479 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2024-0811

Laboratory scale column penetration tests for deep mixing purposes

2025· article· en· W4409533479 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sølve Hov, Edvin Moe, Guro Holte Haraldsen, Priscilla Paniagua, Stefan Larsson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrafikverketNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringPenetration (warfare)GeologyColumn (typography)Penetration testScale (ratio)Mixing (physics)Forensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringOperations research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strength verification of dry deep mixed columns is almost exclusively performed by column penetration tests (KPS) using a probe with two wings shearing into the column. Guidelines specify a constant bearing capacity factor ( NKPS) of 10 to determine the shear strength of the column. This factor has, however, undergone little research, and there are considerable research gaps. Results from laboratory scale tests are presented herein, where cement-improved kaolin columns with three different strengths were tested with KPS and cone penetration tests (CPT). The results showed NKPS ranging from 7.3 to 7.8 at low degrees of confinement around the columns, up to 15.4–16.5 at high degrees of confinement. The column strength did not significantly affect NKPS. The results further indicates that extraction to penetration ratio can be used to predict NKPS. Equivalent bearing capacity factors for CPT were 5.4–7.8 for tests only performed in low degrees of confinement. The findings present new knowledge that degree of confinement is crucial for NKPS, which has important practical implications, particularly that current guidelines oversimplify and might yield unconservative column strengths with increased risk of failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207