Cascade Transformer for Hierarchical Semantic Reasoning in Text-Based Visual Question Answering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Text-based visual question answering (TextVQA) aims to answer questions by understanding scene text in images. However, many current methods overly depend on the accuracy of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) systems, while overlooking the significance of visual objects. They tend to perform poorly when the question involves the relationships between visual objects and scene text. To address the above issues, we focus on raising the status of visual objects and innovatively propose a hierarchical semantic reasoning network (CT-HSR) based on the cascade transformer architecture, achieving fine-grained cross-modal reasoning and visual semantic enhancement. Specifically, the visual representations containing rich semantic information of the question modality are obtained through the cross-modal transformer-based vision-language pre-training model firstly. Then, the uni-modal transformer for unified modality encoding module is utilized to capture visual objects that are more semantically related to OCR texts. In addition, we further alleviate the cross-modal noise interference through the feature filtering strategy. Finally, we better align the three modalities by introducing TextVQA pre-training tasks and generate prediction answers through multi-step iterative prediction during fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on the TextVQA, ST-VQA, and OCR-VQA datasets have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed model compared to the state-of-the-art methods. The code will be released at https://github.com/FTFWO/CT-HSR .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".