MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409540383 · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-24-0044.1

Planetary-Scale Dynamics of Extreme Precipitation Regimes: Precursors and Contributors to Intensity and Longevity

2025· article· en· W4409540383 on OpenAlexafffund
Yeechian Low, John R. Gyakum

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNOAA ResearchFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsPrecipitationEnvironmental scienceClimatologyIntensity (physics)Scale (ratio)LongevityAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyGeologyGeographyPhysicsBiologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extreme precipitation is often challenging to predict but has substantial societal impacts, especially when it is persistent and affects a large region. We analyze Rossby wave packets, jet streams, atmospheric blocking, Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO), and El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and elucidate the associated large-scale physical mechanisms contributing to the occurrence and persistence of extreme precipitation regimes (EPRs) in eastern North America as identified in an earlier study. The large temporal and spatial scales of EPRs, as well as the climatological study of EPRs, distinguish this study from previous precipitation studies, which are mostly on shorter-duration events. EPRs are characterized by an unusually slow-moving and persistent large-scale synoptic-scale circulation structure favorable for the southerly flow of subtropical moisture into eastern North America. The strength of the southerly flow is critical in producing large precipitation rates. The favorable synoptic structure is established by the start of the EPR, moves very slowly eastward until the middle of the EPR, and then travels faster eastward by the end of the EPR. The persistence of midlatitude ridges and the long-wavelength and slow-moving nature of the synoptic structure are critical to the longevity of EPRs. The latent heat release associated with moisture transport and ascent in cyclones provides a feedback mechanism contributing to the persistence. MJO phase 3 is favored before the EPR start, while phases 4 and 5 are favored during the EPR. During EPRs, there is no significant preference for El Niño or La Niña conditions, but a negative Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO) is favored. Significance Statement Cool-season extreme precipitation regimes often lead to flooding and other societal impacts and represent a significant forecast challenge. We analyze large-scale weather patterns and physical mechanisms in the North Pacific and North America contributing to the occurrence and persistence of extreme precipitation regimes. Recognizing them could promote their predictability since the North Pacific is a climatologically favored area for persistent anomalous large-scale weather patterns. The regimes are characterized by an unusually slow-moving and persistent large-scale weather pattern favoring the southerly flow of subtropical moisture into eastern North America. The persistence, size, and slow-moving nature of the weather pattern are critical to the regimes’ longevity. Storms tracking on the west of high pressure areas provide a feedback mechanism that helps maintain the regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207