MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409544065 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf631

Discovery of an intriguing chemically rich outflow in the OMC-2/3 filament

2025· article· en· W4409544065 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mathilde Bouvier, Lisa Giani, Layal Chahine, A. López-Sepulcre, C. Ceccarelli, L. Podio

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAlgal biology and biofuel production
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNational Institutes of Natural SciencesAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyNational Science CouncilEuropean School of OncologyNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanEuropean CommissionU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsOutflowProtein filamentAstrobiologyAstrophysicsAstronomyGeneticsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Studying chemically rich protostellar outflows and their jet provides an important insight into the low-mass star formation process and its related chemistry. While well-known shock tracers such as SiO can be used to study the jet properties and give information about the dynamics of the system, interstellar complex organic molecules (iCOMs) have been useful in constraining the age of shocked gas, for example. Yet, the number of outflows mapped in iCOMs is still limited. In this work, we study the outflow driven by the protostar FIR6c-a (HOPS 409) located in the OMC-2/3 filament. We report the detection of the red-shifted jet, left undetected in previous studies, as well as the detection of the iCOMs methanol (CH$_3$OH) and methyl cyanide (CH$_3$CN) for the first time towards this outflow. Using SiO, we derived some jet properties (i.e. collimation and dynamical time). We found a clear dichotomy between the blue- and red-shifted jets, likely due to the density of the medium in which the jets propagate. In addition, we identified two bow shocks within the blue-shifted part of the outflow, which we attribute to two different ejection events. Finally, using the CH$_{3}$OH and CH$_{3}$CN abundance ratio and chemical modelling, we constrained the outflow age to be $\ge 1000$ yr old and, surprisingly, found that a cosmic ray ionization rate of $10^{-14}$ s$^{-1}$ is needed to reproduce the observed ratio towards the source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAlgal biology and biofuel productionFrench-language works237,207