MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409548019 · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2025.100990

Acute serum protein biomarker profile and prevalence of persistent (>6 months) neuropsychiatric symptoms in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients in Cape Town, South Africa

2025· article· en· W4409548019 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Inette van Niekerk, Monica Panieri, T. Müller, Lovemore Mapahla, Sonwabile Dzanibe, Cascia Day, Dan J. Stein, Jonny Peter

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior & Immunity - Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouth African Medical Research CouncilDepartment of Science and Innovation, South AfricaDiscovery Eye Foundation
KeywordsCapeCohortBiomarkerMedicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Internal medicineCohort studyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseBiologyGeographyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SARS-CoV-2 is a neurotrophic and pro-inflammatory virus, with several acute and more persistent neuropsychiatric sequelae reported. There are limited data from African cohorts and few acute illness biomarkers of persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms. To examine the association of neuropsychiatric outcomes with clinical illness severity, systemic inflammation, cardiovascular and renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) biomarkers. Second, to determine the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in a cohort of South African SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients at least six months following infection/hospitalization. SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients were recruited prospectively from Cape Town, South Africa, including hospitalized patients from ancestral, beta and delta-dominant COVID-19 waves (pre-vaccine rollout); and asymptomatic/mild SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. The 96-protein O-link inflammation and cardiovascular panels, RAS fingerprinting, and antibody responses were measured in serum samples collected at peak severity and recovery (>3 months post-infection). Telephonic interviews were conducted at least six months post infection/hospitalization. Validated measures employed were: WHO Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ-20), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS-11) and Telephonic Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA). Ninety-seven participants completed telephonic interviews. The median (IQR) age was 48 (37–59) years, and 54 % were female. There were no significant associations between neuropsychiatric outcomes and illness severity, systemic inflammation, cardiovascular and/or renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) biomarkers from either peak illness or recovery samples. More than half of this SA COVID-19 cohort had one or more persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms >6 months post vaccine-naïve infection. On the T-MoCA, 44 % of participants showed evidence of cognitive and/or memory impairments. The high prevalence of persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms in this African cohort supports ongoing attention to long COVID. Acute and early serum protein biomarkers were not associated with persistent neuropsychiatric outcomes post-COVD-19. • Neither systemic inflammatory, cardiovascular, nor renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) biomarkers or antibody responses performed during the peak of illness or on a recovery sample at least three months after disease resolution, could predict persistent post-infection longer term (>6months) neuropsychiatric symptom outcomes • More than half of participants from this South African post COVID-19 cohort (median 45 years old) were affected by neuropsychiatric symptoms of anxiety, fatigue, memory and cognitive impairment across the spectrum of disease severity (from asymptomatic to critical).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain Behavior & Immunity - HealthSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207