Smart Data Prefetching Using KNN to Improve Hadoop Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hadoop is an open-source framework that enables the parallel processing of large data sets across a cluster of machines. It faces several challenges that can lead to poor performance, such as I/O operations, network data transmission, and high data access time. In recent years, researchers have explored prefetching techniques to reduce the data access time as a potential solution to these problems. Nevertheless, several issues must be considered to optimize the prefetching mechanism. These include launching the prefetch at an appropriate time to avoid conflicts with other operations and minimize waiting time, determining the amount of prefetched data to avoid overload and underload, and placing the prefetched data in locations that can be accessed efficiently when required. In this paper, we propose a smart prefetch mechanism that consists of three phases designed to address these issues. First, we enhance the task progress rate to calculate the optimal time for triggering prefetch operations. Next, we utilize K-Nearest Neighbor clustering to identify which data blocks should be prefetched in each round, employing the data locality feature to determine the placement of prefetched data. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed smart prefetch mechanism improves job execution time by an average of 28.33% by increasing the rate of local tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it