MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409556111 · doi:10.5006/c2005-05232

Corrosion Resistance of UNS N04400 vs Electroless Nickel in Simulated Marine Service

2005· article· en· W4409556111 on OpenAlexaff
Robert D. Klassen, Yong Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLife Cycle Costing Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionNickelMetallurgyMaterials scienceService lifeComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract UNS N04400 cladding on steel valves can corrode during marine service, most seriously in the form of grooves or pits. Re-cladding of valves that are welded to the hull is very costly because of the processes of removal and re-attachment. There is then a need to develop techniques to repair these valves in-situ without removing them from the hull. The present work investigated the potential of plating with electroless nickel (EN) for repair. In this technique, a layer of about 90% nickel (the balance is phosphorous) is deposited chemically onto the damaged surface. A non-electrolytic cleaning technique was developed to allow EN to coat over the bottom of corrosion pits. The uniform corrosion rate of an EN coating in artificial seawater was measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and was found to be less than that for N04400. Both N04400 and EN form a protective anodic layer in artificial seawater. The tendency towards pitting and crevice corrosion of an EN coating was also found to be better than that of N04400. The main conclusion from this work is that an EN coating could be a viable solution to repair N04400-clad valves in-situ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLife Cycle Costing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207