The Influence of Childhood Trauma on the Real‐World Effectiveness of Ketamine in Adults With Treatment‐Resistant Depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction Childhood trauma is a well‐established risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD) and is often associated with attenuated response to conventional antidepressant therapies. Ketamine has emerged as an effective treatment for treatment‐resistant depression (TRD), but the impact of childhood trauma on its effectiveness remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to determine whether childhood trauma influences the antidepressant effectiveness of ketamine in TRD. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on data from adults with TRD ( n = 83) who received four ketamine infusions at a community outpatient clinic. Participants were categorized based on cumulative trauma load (high vs. low) and specific trauma types, assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Depressive symptoms were measured using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self‐Report 16‐item (QIDS‐SR16) at baseline and following each infusion. Linear mixed models and chi‐square tests were used to evaluate the impact of trauma on ketamine's antidepressant effectiveness. Results Depressive symptoms significantly decreased across all participants over time, with an average reduction of 5.7 points in QIDS‐SR16 scores ( p < 0.001). High childhood trauma load was reported by 55% of participants. Response rates were 25% in the high trauma load group and 19% in the low trauma load group, while remission rates were 14% and 11%, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in antidepressant effectiveness ( p = 0.572), response rates ( p = 0.230), or remission rates ( p = 0.397) between participants with high versus low trauma loads. Further analysis also revealed no significant associations between specific types of childhood trauma and antidepressant effectiveness, response, or remission outcomes. Conclusion Childhood trauma did not attenuate ketamine's antidepressant effectiveness in TRD. These findings support ketamine as a viable treatment for individuals with TRD, including those with significant trauma histories. Further research is warranted to replicate these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".