MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409556439 · doi:10.1111/acps.13812

The Influence of Childhood Trauma on the Real‐World Effectiveness of Ketamine in Adults With Treatment‐Resistant Depression

2025· article· en· W4409556439 on OpenAlexaff
Danica E. Johnson, Nelson B. Rodrigues, Rodrigo B. Mansur, Roger S. McIntyre, Joshua D. Rosenblat

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)Treatment-resistant depressionKetaminePsychiatryPsychologyMedicineClinical psychologyPsychotherapistAntidepressantAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Childhood trauma is a well‐established risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD) and is often associated with attenuated response to conventional antidepressant therapies. Ketamine has emerged as an effective treatment for treatment‐resistant depression (TRD), but the impact of childhood trauma on its effectiveness remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to determine whether childhood trauma influences the antidepressant effectiveness of ketamine in TRD. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on data from adults with TRD ( n = 83) who received four ketamine infusions at a community outpatient clinic. Participants were categorized based on cumulative trauma load (high vs. low) and specific trauma types, assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Depressive symptoms were measured using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self‐Report 16‐item (QIDS‐SR16) at baseline and following each infusion. Linear mixed models and chi‐square tests were used to evaluate the impact of trauma on ketamine's antidepressant effectiveness. Results Depressive symptoms significantly decreased across all participants over time, with an average reduction of 5.7 points in QIDS‐SR16 scores ( p < 0.001). High childhood trauma load was reported by 55% of participants. Response rates were 25% in the high trauma load group and 19% in the low trauma load group, while remission rates were 14% and 11%, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in antidepressant effectiveness ( p = 0.572), response rates ( p = 0.230), or remission rates ( p = 0.397) between participants with high versus low trauma loads. Further analysis also revealed no significant associations between specific types of childhood trauma and antidepressant effectiveness, response, or remission outcomes. Conclusion Childhood trauma did not attenuate ketamine's antidepressant effectiveness in TRD. These findings support ketamine as a viable treatment for individuals with TRD, including those with significant trauma histories. Further research is warranted to replicate these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Psychiatrica ScandinavicaSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207