The Effect of an Integrative Cognitive Training Program by Family Caregivers on Cognitive Function Among Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to examine the effect of an integrative cognitive training program by family caregivers on cognitive function among persons with traumatic brain injury. Design A randomized controlled trial, repeated measures design was utilized. Methods The participants were adult persons diagnosed with mild‐to‐moderate TBI and their family caregivers. They were recruited from the neurology ward at a tertiary hospital in Thailand. One hundred participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 50) and the control group (n = 50). The experimental group received an integrative cognitive training program from family caregivers based on the theory of neural plasticity in combination with a systematic review, while the control group received usual care. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and week 2, week 4, and week 6 follow‐up using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi‐square, Fisher's exact test, and repeated measures ANOVA. Findings The results showed a significant improvement in cognitive function scores in the experimental group over time (p < 0.001). Additionally, participants in the experimental group who received an integrative cognitive training program by family caregivers demonstrated significantly higher cognitive function scores compared to the control group at week 4 and week 6 follow‐up assessments (p < 0.001). The effect sizes were large (η 2 = 0.14) with a test power of 90%. Conclusions An integrative cognitive training program can enhance neuroplasticity and improve cognitive function among persons with mild‐to‐moderate traumatic brain injury. Moreover, involving family caregivers in the rehabilitation process can improve community engagement and cognitive abilities in persons with traumatic brain injury. Clinical Relevance Healthcare professionals in neurological settings should incorporate an integrative cognitive training program into their usual care and educate family caregivers to continue the intervention at home for improving cognitive function among persons with mild‐to‐moderate traumatic brain injury. Trial Registration TCTR20230828002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".