Variants in CFAP410 cause a range of retinal and skeletal phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ciliopathies are associated with a range of phenotypes including retinal degeneration and skeletal abnormalities. We present a retrospective study of 49 patients with variants in Cilia and Flagella Associated Protein 410 (CFAP410) from multiple ophthalmic centers across the world. Common clinical features included early-onset reduced visual acuity, photophobia, and delayed light-to-dark adaptation. A cone-rod dystrophy pattern was observed roughly two times more commonly than rod-cone dystrophy. A minority of patients (22.4%) presented with skeletal abnormalities consistent with axial spondylometaphyseal dysplasia (SMDAX). Patients with the most severe ophthalmic and skeletal phenotypes had disease-associated variants within conserved leucine-rich regions of CFAP410, and the structural effects of these variants were modelled using ChimeraX. This report furthers our understanding of CFAP410-associated clinical phenotypes such as retinal dystrophy and skeletal dysplasia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".