Recombinant chymase inhibits fibrinolysis induced by endogenous plasmin in clotted human blood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Our group recently reported that chymase, a serine protease synthetized and released by mast cells, plays a pivotal role in thrombi stabilization in murine deep vein thrombosis (DVT) models, by interfering with the fibrinolytic properties of endogenous plasmin within thrombi. However, the impact of mast cell-derived chymase on endogenous plasmin activity in human blood clots has yet to be explored. Methods The antifibrinolytic properties of human recombinant chymase (rCMA-1) were investigated using an in vitro thrombolysis assay based on halo-shaped human blood clots. In addition, a fluorogenic assay was used to detect chymase activity in human thromboembolic biopsies. In both assays, the activity of human chymase was validated using a specific chymase inhibitor, fulacimstat (BAY 1142524). Results Although rapidly neutralized in plasma, rCMA-1 remains active within the local microenvironment of a blood clot, inducing resistance to endogenous plasmin-mediated fibrinolysis in the presence of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). This leads to a concentration-dependent decrease in clot lysis by rCMA-1. The plasmin-inactivating properties of rCMA-1 were inhibited by fulacimstat, resulting in an accelerated clot dissolution. The pro-fibrinolytic effects of fulacimstat in human blood clots were reversed by a plasminogen/plasmin inhibitor, BAY 1214237. Finally, fulacimstat-sensitive chymase activity was identified in thrombi collected from thrombectomy patients, supporting the potential role of the mast cell-derived serine protease in human blood clot stabilization under pathological conditions. Conclusion These in vitro experiments with human whole blood suggest that mast cell-derived chymase impairs blood clot resolution by interfering with the fibrinolytic activity of endogenous intra-clot plasmin. Our findings provide evidence that recombinant mast cell chymase interferes with endogenous plasmin activity in human whole blood clots in vitro and support the potential of chymase inhibitors, such as fulacimstat, as fibrinolytic agents for thrombotic and thromboembolic disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".