MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409560738 · doi:10.5006/c2004-04532

Sulfidation Corrosion in the Presence of Oxidizing Gases

2004· article· en· W4409560738 on OpenAlexaff
R. C. John, Arthur D. Pelton, Alvin L. Young, W. T. Thompson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfidationOxidizing agentCorrosionMaterials scienceMetallurgyChemistrySulfur

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many alloys exposed in high-temperature process equipment corrode by sulfidation corrosion in the presence of steam or other oxidizing gases. This paper discusses the latest results of an extensive testing program for a diverse group of about 50 commercial alloys exposed to temperatures of 573 – 1273 K with exposure times up to 6,000 hours for a total data compilation of nearly 4 million hr. The data compilation now allows engineering corrosion assessments for sulfidation and sulfidation in the presence of oxidizing gases and predictions for wide ranges of conditions. The effects of gas composition, temperature, exposure time and alloy type have all been analyzed and compiled to allow prediction of corrosion for wide ranges of conditions to allow engineering predictions of corrosion-limited lifetimes. Applications for this technology are found in industries such as oil refining, petrochemicals production, pulp/paper production, and power generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207