MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409563382 · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaf092

Genetic Differentiation is Constrained to Chromosomal Inversions and Putative Centromeres in Locally Adapted Populations With Higher Gene Flow

2025· article· en· W4409563382 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Akopyan, Anna Tigano, Arne Jacobs, Aryn P. Wilder, Nina Overgaard Therkildsen

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology and Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyLocal adaptationGene flowGenomeEvolutionary biologyGeneticsAdaptation (eye)RecombinationGeneGenetic variationPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of genome structure on adaptation is a growing focus in evolutionary biology, revealing an important role for structural variation and recombination landscapes in shaping genetic diversity across genomes and among populations. This is particularly relevant when local adaptation occurs despite gene flow, where clustering of differentiated loci can maintain locally adapted variants by reducing recombination between them. However, the limited genomic resources for nonmodel species, including reference genomes and recombination maps, have constrained our understanding of these patterns. In this study, we leverage the Atlantic silverside-a nonmodel fish with extensive local adaptation across a steep latitudinal gradient-as an ideal system to explore how genome structure influences adaptation under varying levels of gene flow, using a newly available reference genome and multiple recombination maps. Analyzing 168 genomes from four populations, we found a continuum of genome-wide differentiation increasing from south to north, reflecting higher connectivity among southern populations and reduced gene flow at northern latitudes. With increasing gene flow, the number and clustering of FST outlier loci also increased, with differentiated loci found exclusively within large haploblocks harboring inversions and smaller peaks overlapping putative centromeric regions. Notably, sequence divergence was only evident in inversions, supporting their role in adaptive divergence with gene flow, whereas centromeric regions appeared differentiated because of low recombination and diversity, with no indication of elevated divergence. Our results support the hypothesis that clustered genomic architectures evolve with high gene flow and enhance our understanding of how inversions and centromeres are linked to different evolutionary processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology and EvolutionSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207