MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409570863 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-001

Research on the Evolution Mechanism of Street Morphology in Ongi Village Based on Spatial Syntax and Genetic Algorithm Optimisation

2025· article· en· W4409570863 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yitao Wang, Zhian Liu, Xiaoxuan Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanism (biology)Morphology (biology)SyntaxSpace syntaxComputer scienceAlgorithmGeographyEvolutionary biologyArtificial intelligenceBiologyZoologyEpistemologySpace (punctuation)Philosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the birthplace of national culture, traditional villages can convey cultural and social natures through spatial configuration. Based on the theory of spatial syntax, this paper combines the genetic algorithm to design the fitness function for optimization, and selects the streets and lanes of Wengji Village as the research sample, focusing on the analysis of its morphological evolution mechanism from 1975 to 2020. Through quantitative analysis, it is found that although the streets and alleys of Wengji Village show spatial scale expansion due to social and economic development, the village streets and alleys can still maintain the original spatial texture and style. The integration degree, selectability, synergy (0.4273~0.6395) and comprehensibility (0.3744~0.5761) of the streets and alleys in Wengji Village are all characterized by increasing, indicating that the spatial accessibility, spatial openness and spatial wholeness of the streets and alleys in Wengji Village have been improved. However, the degree of synergy and comprehensibility are still lower than 0.7, and there is some room for optimization of the wholeness and cognizability of the streets and lanes of Wengji Village. It is necessary to protect and continue the overall structure of the village, optimize and integrate the key spaces of the village, and rationally control the development process of the village, so as to promote the protection of the spatial form of the streets and lanes of Wengji Village and the continuation of the cultural lineage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207