MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409571683 · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102417

Local impact of trees on thermal comfort of pedestrians in streets

2025· article· en· W4409571683 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueUrban Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsThermal comfortEnvironmental sciencePedestrianArchitectural engineeringTransport engineeringGeographyEnvironmental planningEngineeringMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban thermal comfort can be improved by trees. A better understanding of the effects of trees on urban climate in streets can provide better guidelines on the optimized use of vegetation in cities to moderate temperatures. In this study, we explore and quantify both improvement and deterioration of urban thermal comfort due to street trees, modeled based on a common street tree in Montreal, by varying planting patterns, street orientation and wind direction. The impact of trees on outdoor thermal comfort is studied at street level and at balcony level for multistoried residential buildings over 24-hour cycles. The study is performed with a suite of urban climate models based on OpenFOAM, considering turbulent and buoyant air flow, heat and moisture transport in porous media and short- and long-wave radiative exchanges. Results are presented in terms of Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI). To quantify zones and periods of impact of trees on thermal comfort during day and night, we introduce several new comfort indices: the cooling and heating indices, that describe the level of thermal comfort improvement or deterioration, respectively, and the cooling and heating areas, indicating which areas of the street are affected. We show that tree canopies can be strong assets during the day, as trees intercept solar radiation and provide shading. However, as a counterpoint, they may cause deterioration of thermal comfort during night, stretching sometimes into the morning. Street orientation is found to have a larger impact on thermal comfort than wind direction, while wind flow parallel to the street leads to more comfortable conditions than perpendicular wind. We identify street orientations and tree planting patterns that enhance thermal comfort. • New metrics are proposed to better describe the thermal comfort impact of trees. • Shadowing effects should be maximized through planting patterns and street orientations. • Street orientation has a larger impact on thermal comfort than wind direction. • Trees negatively affect nighttime thermal comfort by blocking cooling of hot surfaces. • Depending on their locations, trees can deteriorate or improve resident thermal comfort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it