An engineering control design approach based on high-dimensional data analysis in closed-loop systems for industrial networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Industrial processes are constantly developing towards large-scale and automation, and the smooth, safe, high-quality, and efficient operation of industrial processes has become a hot spot of concern, and higher requirements have been put forward for the control of production processes. This study analyzes the high-dimensional data in the closed-loop system of industrial network based on the HOPLS-SVM algorithm with higher-order singular value decomposition method. A BP neural network model is constructed with the processed data as the input set to realize the real-time prediction of the main data in the project, and the error of the prediction model is corrected by using linear regression method, and then the project prediction control system is constructed by piggybacking on the model. The results show that the prediction performance of the model in this paper is better than that of the comparison model, and the average absolute error is only 0.0347. At the same time, it is found that the control system in the decomposition project of CHP is able to regulate and optimize the temperature and flow rate of the crude product, which ensures the balance between the product temperature and yield, and the safety of the project operation. The engineering control method designed in this study has strong adaptability and effectiveness, and can provide solutions to engineering control problems in complex industrial processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".