Application of Artificial Intelligence-based Music Generation Technology in Popular Music Production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence has been applied in many aspects of life, however, AI algorithms have been less used in the field of music. In this paper, a multi-track based pop music generation model MuseGAN is proposed, due to its poor contextualization and excessive tempo jumps in generating pop music samples. In this paper, a new multi-track pop music generation model-Recurrent Feature Generation Adversarial Network RFGAN is proposed. the model addresses the temporal relevance of the music structure and the repetitive nature of the musical section, and proposes a temporal model that enhances the contextual relevance of the music samples in terms of the time series, and improves the generative model according to this temporal model by converting the unidirectional structure in the original model to a recurrent structure, adding the feature extractor to the previous level of training information, which is combined with arbitrary noise and passed to the next training. An average pooling layer is added at the end of the generative model as a solution to the situation where the model generates too much noise for pop music samples. The improved model is superior to the pre-improvement model in terms of stability, convergence speed, and overfitting in pop music generation. In the audience scoring experiment, 60% of the top 5 pop music scores were generated using the RFGAN model proposed in this paper, indicating that the pop music generated using the RFGAN model has reached a high level comparable to the level of artificial pop music composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".