MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409573370 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-021

Research on Supply Chain Optimization and Economic Efficiency Improvement of Manufacturing Enterprises

2025· article· en· W4409573370 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yang Song

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCollaboration in agile enterprises
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainBusinessIndustrial organizationSupply chain optimizationSupply chain managementManufacturing engineeringEngineeringMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supply chain optimization configuration contributes to the improvement and development of enterprise business application system. This paper takes the supply chain of manufacturing enterprises as the research object and analyzes the economic benefits of supply chain optimization of manufacturing enterprises. Aiming at the current development environment of enterprises, it puts forward the necessity of the development of enterprise supply chain flexibility, and establishes the overall supply chain flexibility model that contains the supply flexibility of the supply chain, the manufacturing flexibility and the distribution flexibility of the distributors. Simplify the total cost model of supply chain and establish the demand-driven supply chain optimization model. Analyze and validate the parameter settings of the improved particle swarm algorithm, and obtain the operating efficiency of the improved particle swarm algorithm with the changes of ordering cycle and inventory capacity. Combined with the sample enterprises, analyze the financial savings of each link after supply chain optimization. Further measurements show that after supply chain optimization of Company R, the saving percentage is 10.24%, and the annual saving amount is 562,807 yuan, with obvious economic benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicCollaboration in agile enterprisesFrench-language works237,207