A deep neural network-based strategy for recommending online teaching resources for ideological and political theory courses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the development of the informationization era, it has become the norm for teachers of Civics and Political Science courses in colleges and universities to assist classroom teaching through network resources. In order to further utilize network resources to make them better serve the classroom teaching of Civics and Politics courses in colleges and universities, this paper optimizes the teaching resources recommendation technology based on deep neural network. Defining the network teaching resources data as a ternary group , we put forward the research hypothesis and LSTM model, and establish the G-LSTM recommendation model for recommending the teaching resources of ideological network. The overall framework of G-LSTM model is described, and the recommendation based on G-LSTM is applied to the ideological network teaching resources recommendation. Adopt AUC, MRR and NDCG as evaluation indexes to check the performance indexes of G-LSTM model. Combined with the actual teaching of ideologic theory class, the practical effect of G-LSTM recommendation model is analyzed. 67.81% of students and 39.71% of teachers recognize each recommended online teaching resources. It shows that the improved LSTM model in this paper can further screen the ideological and political network teaching resources, and the teaching resources recommended by the model are more suitable for the teaching of ideological and political theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it