Research on physical properties of shale gas reservoirs in Hunan Province based on the analysis model of logging data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most areas in Hunan Province are rich in shale gas blocks, and their shale gas reservoir physical properties, geological characteristics, and enrichment rules need to be further studied. The article chooses the five # logging data of the Xiaoyanxi Formation in Anhua, Hunan Province, as the research object, preprocesses the logging data by curve environmental influence correction, curve reconstruction, and normalization, calculates the total organic carbon content and mineral composition change of shale gas by multiple linear regression, and uses the multi-mineral content calculated by optimization algorithm combined with the volumetric model to realize the matrix porosity of the variable skeleton. Then, the differential equivalent medium, self-compatible approximation, and K-T models were used to calculate the shale rock skeleton modulus. Then the shale gas reservoir petrophysical model was constructed. The adsorbed gas and free gas of the shale gas reservoir were solved separately to obtain the total gas content of the shale gas reservoir. The average TOC content solved by the model is 1.79%, which is only 2.23% higher than the absolute error of the actual data. When the volume fraction of the organic matter mixture increased from 0 to 0.25, the relative change of the longitudinal and transverse wave velocity ratio was only 0.87%. The shale gas content in Anhua Xiaoyanxi Formation 5# in Hunan Province ranges from 0.87 to 8.41 cm³/g, significantly higher than the lower limit value for shale gas industrial development. Recorded well data can clarify the reservoir’s physical characteristics of shale gas in Hunan Province and provide data support for exploring shale gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".