MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409573820 · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02715-y

Increased level of serum asymmetric dimethylarginine in individuals with more severe cognitive impairment, as evaluated using Montreal Cognitive Assessment instead of Mini-Mental State Examination

2025· article· en· W4409573820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lei Liu, Jiaxin Guan, Zhiqiang Song, Qiang Gao, Zhaoqi Yan, Ying Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentAsymmetric dimethylargininePsychologyCognitionCognitive impairmentMental stateClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the link between cognitive impairment and levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). METHODS: The study included 172 patients from the Department of Geriatrics and Neurology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. The enrollment period spanned from October 2013 to July 2014. To assess their cognitive function, we used the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Additionally, automatic biochemical analyzers were employed to measure various biochemical blood indexes, while enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine the serum ADMA concentrations. RESULTS: The participants were categorized into four groups based on the MMSE scale, which reflects cognition (higher scores indicating better cognitive function), and five groups based on the MoCA scale, which also measures cognition (higher scores indicating better cognitive function). Various factors were analyzed for their statistical significance in relation to different cognitive impairment groups determined by each scale. Regarding the MoCA scale, the following factors were found to be statistically significant: Age (P = 0.0001), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.0261), ALT (P = 0.0104), AST (P = 0.0106), endogenous creatinine clearance (P = 0.0006), and serum ADMA concentration (P = 0.0383). For the MMSE scale, the following factors showed statistical significance: Age (P = 0.0008), ALT (P = 0.0002), AST (P = 0.0088), CRP (P = 0.0407), and endogenous creatinine clearance (P = 0.0027). Interestingly, as the scores on the MoCA scale decreased, the serum ADMA concentration increased (P=0.0383), but this trend was not observed in the groups classified based on the MMSE scale (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The level of sensitivity measured by the MoCA scale indicated the presence of initial cognitive dysfunction. The extent of cognitive impairment showed a direct correlation with ADMA levels, indirectly implying a connection between impaired endothelial function and cognitive dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207