MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409574302 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554119

The Pristine survey

2025· article· en· W4409574302 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tadafumi Matsuno, T. Sitnova, Rodrigo Ibata, Anke Arentsen, R. G. Carlberg, Erika M. Holmbeck, G. Kordopatis, Fangzhou Jiang, Khyati Malhan, Julio F. Navarro, Federico Sestito, Kim A. Venn, Akshara Viswanathan, Sara Vitali

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Space AgencyCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsMetalAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery of the most metal-poor stream, C-19, provides us with a fossil record of a stellar structure born very soon after the big bang. In this work, we search for new C-19 members throughout the sky by combining two complementary stream-searching algorithms, STREAMFINDER and StarGO, and utilizing low-metallicity star samples from the Pristine survey, as well as Gaia BP and RP spectrophotometric catalogs. We confirm 13 new members, spread over more than 100°, using velocity and metallicity information from a set of spectroscopic follow-up programs that targeted a quasi-complete sample of our bright candidates (G ≲ 16.0). From the updated set of stream members, we confirm that the stream is wide, with a stream width of ~200 pc, and dynamically hot, with a derived velocity dispersion of 10.9-1.5+2.1 km s−1. The tension remains between these quantities and a purely baryonic scenario in which the relatively low-mass stream (even updated to a few 104 M⊙) stems from a globular cluster progenitor, as suggested by its chemical abundances. Some heating mechanism, such as preheating of the cluster in its own dark matter halo or through interactions with halo substructures, appears necessary to explain the tension. The impact of binaries on the measured dispersion also remains unknown. Detailed elemental abundances of more stream members, as well as multi-epoch radial velocities from spectroscopic observations, are therefore crucial to fully understanding the nature and past history of the most metal-poor stream of the Milky Way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicTribology and Lubrication EngineeringFrench-language works237,207