MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409574451 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs020231712218

Restoring Functions and Hope, the Role of Public Health/Community Medicine in Hand Burn Recovery

2023· article· en· W4409574451 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthMedicinePolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Hand burns generate severe functional limitations that restrict people from doing their daily routines and affect their life quality. Parts of plastic surgery practice focus on restoring hand function via skin grafting in combination with flap reconstruction and contracture release procedures. The research assesses how plastic surgery enhances healing along with functional improvement and scar quality in patients burned on their hands. Methodology: The researchers conducted their study at Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan for the duration of 12 months from June 2022 to June, 2023 with 128 participants who experienced second- and third-degree hand burns. The surgical treatments for patients included skin grafting and local flap procedures alongside contracture release methods according to burn extent. Examining functional recovery used the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) and rating scar quality depended on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) at different follow-up sessions particularly at 12 weeks and 12 months. All statistical procedures involved paired t-tests and ANOVA along with regression models operating at p values below 0.05. Results: The 12-week results showed that 94.5% of patients achieved full epithelialization which continued to provide functional enhancement until the 12-month evaluation. The MHQ scores demonstrated statistical improvement from 42.3 ± 9.6 to 81.7 ± 8.9 (p < 0.001) while VSS scores showed a similar pattern with results changing from 12.4 ± 3.1 to 4.3 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001). The functional outcomes from flap reconstruction procedures reached 85.6 ± 7.2 points (p < 0.01) with entirely successful results while patient age above 61, diabetes mellitus, and severe burn injury exacerbated negative outcomes (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The outcome of hand burn patients receiving plastic surgery improves their wound healing as well as their hand function and produces superior scarring results. More studies should examine both extended treatment results along with additional treatment options for patients. Keywords: Hand burns, plastic surgery, skin grafting, functional recovery, wound healing, reconstructive surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePakistan Journal of Medical & Health SciencesSame topicBurn Injury Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207