MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409574752 · doi:10.1111/jpy.70017

Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes of <i>Chaetoceros</i> species

2025· article· en· W4409574752 on OpenAlexaff
Zongmei Cui, XU Qing, Feng Liu, Jing Wang, Nan-Sheng Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Phycology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChaetocerosBiologySyntenyPhylogenetic treeEcologyPhytoplanktonGenomeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chaetoceros is one of the most diverse genera of marine planktonic diatoms. Chaetoceros species are common and may become dominant in coastal ecosystems. Many Chaetoceros species can develop harmful algal blooms with negative effects on the aquaculture industry. In this study, we constructed full-length mitochondrial genomes (mtDNAs) for 12 Chaetoceros species, including eight known species and four undescribed species. The sizes of these mtDNAs are generally similar, varying from 34,174 to 39,411 bp. Despite extensive synteny conservation, discrete regions showed high variations, and based on these regions, a specific primer chaetomt1 for Chaetoceros species was designed. The availability of mtDNAs from various Chaetoceros species is not only valuable as a super-barcode for phylogenetic analysis but also important for functional and evolutionary analysis of diatoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PhycologySame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207