Research on the Impact of Urban Sports Industry on Economic Development Based on Data Mining Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of urbanization is rapidly changing, and various undertakings are flourishing, while the sports industry, as an important segment of urban regional economic development, plays an inestimable role in the development of the entire city construction. The study takes the sports industry and economic development of 27 provincial capital cities in China from 2018 to 2022 as the research object, establishes the evaluation indexes for the high-quality development of the sports industry based on the principle of index construction, and establishes the weights of the indexes. Taking Harbin as a case study, the effect between urban sports industry and economic growth is analyzed with the help of impulse response analysis, Granger causality test, and variance decomposition of VAR model. The results show that the development of urban sports industry and economic growth can promote each other, with a long-term cointegration relationship, and the positive effects between the two are slowly reduced over time when they are impacted in the long term. Granger test shows. It indicates that there is a unidirectional causal relationship between urban sports industry and economic growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".