MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409574789 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-063

Algorithm-Driven Energy Conversion Efficiency Enhancement Technology for High Power Laser Devices

2025· article· en· W4409574789 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Juanhui Ren, Qin Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Systems and Laser Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Energy conversion efficiencyLaserEfficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)Materials scienceEnergy transformationComputer scienceOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineering physicsOpticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continuous development of high-power laser equipment and the continuous expansion of the scope of the application platform, the demand and application of high-power laser equipment in various fields are becoming more and more extensive, and its output power has also put forward higher requirements. In order to promote the development of high power laser equipment toward higher energy conversion efficiency, research and design temperature control device to manage the waste heat generated in the energy conversion process of high power laser equipment. On the basis of PID control algorithm using LADRC algorithm, rapid realization of temperature precision control, so as to enhance the energy conversion efficiency of high-power laser equipment. When the temperature control device in the temperature control range of 10 ℃ ~ 40 ℃, the temperature control accuracy is better than ± 0.03 ℃, and in 144s to reach the set temperature, the temperature control overshoot is less than 2.33%, to meet the requirements of the laser working temperature control in the working process of high-power laser equipment, and to lay the foundation for the realization of high energy conversion efficiency. Compared with the modified PID controller, the energy conversion efficiency is relatively improved by 1.57%. The temperature control device designed based on the improved PID control algorithm in this paper can significantly improve the energy conversion efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicOptical Systems and Laser TechnologyFrench-language works237,207