MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409574805 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-061

Research on the integration construction technology of planted roofs and self-insulated exterior wall panels

2025· article· en· W4409574805 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liang He, Yanlong Wang, Xiaoyu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectural engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planted roofs have good heat preservation and insulation properties, which can effectively alleviate the urban heat island effect and reduce the energy consumption of buildings and the carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere. The study describes the heat transfer process of planted roofs into three parts, derives the heat transfer equations of the leaf layer, soil layer, and roof layer of planted roofs, and clarifies the calculation of relevant parameters in the model of planted roofs. Taking integrated design as the technical standard, the stereotypical design of planted roof buildings and their building parts, components, fittings, engineering equipment, etc. The insulation exterior wall panel enclosure system is standardized to realize industrialized production of wall panel components, integrated design of connection nodes, and assembly construction. The analysis results show that during the test time, the average convective heat transfer heat flow of Module H containing vegetation is a maximum of 119.21W/m2, and the total convective heat transfer heat flow of the whole day is 2835.99w/m2, which has the best thermal insulation performance. Among all the roof modules, only Module H has the heat transfer direction from outdoor to indoor throughout the day. Finally, based on the above conclusions, the self-insulated exterior wall system’s specific construction method and technology are given to provide the basis and reference for the specific construction in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicEducational Reforms and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207