Research on identity recognition technology of regional electric power marketing management information platform based on deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper first introduces the regional power marketing management platform, after which the 3 major functional modules of this power marketing management platform are designed. Then MobileFaceNet is used as the basic network for face recognition feature extraction in the context of deep learning, and the SE module is used to optimize the network performance and network expressiveness. Afterwards, the Taylor expansion of the negative log-likelihood function is used as an optimization criterion to optimize the face detection model (MTCNN) and the face recognition model (SE-MobileFaceNet). Finally, the running effect and performance of SE-MobileFaceNet model are measured. The main conclusions are as follows: in 1:1 mode, the accuracy of SE-MobileFaceNet model for the three datasets DRDS, DE and DPDS is 95.99%, 96.98% and 98.83%, respectively. In addition, the SE-MobileFaceNet model can avoid excessive redundant calculations, so that its recognition rate reaches 95%.The accuracy of the SE-MobileFaceNet model for monitoring and recognizing the information of the management platform ranges from 97.43% to 100%, and it has a good operating effect in the identification of the regional electric power marketing management information platform, and the overall satisfaction rate of the testers for the model is also >85%. The overall satisfaction of the testers to the model is also >85%. Obviously, the SE-MobileFaceNet model proposed in this paper has a very broad application in regional power marketing management information platform identity recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".