Geometric Algorithms for Garment Pattern Design and Pattern Generation Based on Graphical Processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pattern design of clothing appearance is one of the important links in clothing design, which makes an important contribution to the overall aesthetics and sales of clothing. As a product of computer technology, the development and application of graphic processing technology has been extended to various industries and fields of society, especially in the field of design with more extensive use. However, the current clothing pattern design is still too dependent on the designer, so this paper is based on pattern processing, combined with fractal algorithm and genetic algorithm to build a pattern generation algorithm for clothing pattern. And the quality of the generated pattern is optimized based on the anti-alignment algorithm, so as to improve the overall quality of the generated pattern. After testing, the real-time generation speed of the pattern generation algorithms for clothing patterns in this paper is greater than 15FPS, and from the subjective and objective points of view, the generated patterns have good quality to meet the needs of use. After the anti-alignment optimization of this paper’s algorithm in different error intervals in the number of pixels accounted for the percentage of screen pixels are the highest, are more than 99%, to further validate the optimization effect of this paper’s method. Finally, in the evaluation of the use of the algorithm, the testers have a high degree of satisfaction with the dimensions of this paper’s algorithm, respectively, 4.04, 3.98, 4.21 and 4.11, which shows that this paper’s algorithm can satisfy the practical needs and can realize the intelligent generation of clothing pattern design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".