A Study on the Geometric Characteristics of Line Mobility and Structural Changes in the Aesthetic System of Chinese Calligraphy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As an important part of Chinese traditional culture and art, how to efficiently realize the recognition, retrieval and style appreciation of calligraphy is of great significance. Aiming at the shortcomings of the traditional geometric feature recognition model with low recognition efficiency, this paper applies morphological neural network to the geometric feature recognition of calligraphy to design a geometric feature recognition model for calligraphy. Image enhancement is performed on the calligraphic graphics, the expansion pooling subnet is designed to replace the maximum pooling layer, and the calligraphic geometric feature recognition network is constructed by combining the residual block structure. The average recognition accuracy of this model in the geometric feature refinement recognition task is as high as 97.23%, which is higher than that of the comparative models such as CNN, LeNet-5, and the recognition accuracies are not less than 96% for the Euclidean, Liu, Zhao, and Yan styles. Using the model of this paper to explore the influence of calligraphic line fluidity and structural changes on the geometric features, it is analyzed that the “line” has a more significant influence on the geometric features of calligraphy than the “structure”. In the six types of traditional calligraphy, such as large seal, small seal, official script, regular script, line script, and cursive script, cursive script is only similar to the geometric characteristics of line script, and the geometric characteristics are very unique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".