A Study on Modeling and Computing of Lexical Semantic Relationships in Japanese Language Based on Multidimensional Vector Space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multidimensional vector space is the basis of lexical semantic correlation computation, which is able to assess the similarity between lexical semantics. In this paper, we implement a Japanese lexical named entity recognition and semantic relation calculation method based on this method. Dependency relations are fitted using N-Gram and knowledge expansion, contextual relations are corrected using collocation frequency, and semantic interactions are determined by semantic linking methods. The accuracy and recall of the identification of this method are higher than that of the spatial semantic role method by 0.78% and 4.93%, respectively, and the quantized values of the calculated correlations accurately reflect the strong and weak lexical semantic relationships. The results of the disambiguation experiments show that the maximum correlations computed using the method of this paper are consistent with the corresponding semantic items. Therefore, the method designed in this paper for recognizing named entities and calculating semantic relations of Japanese words has a relatively accurate recognition rate of semantic relations and has the ability of disambiguation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".