MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409576483 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-111

Research on dynamic texture generation method of digital media art based on fractal geometry

2025· article· en· W4409576483 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiangyuan Zeng, Cheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractalTexture (cosmology)GeometryComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intangible cultural heritage is an important part of national culture, carrying rich historical information and cultural value. This paper mainly generates digital media art based on the characteristics of intangible cultural symbols through fractal geometry, and builds a digital media communication mode of intangible cultural art on the basis of dynamic texture, so as to realize the digital protection and inheritance of intangible cultural heritage. On the basis of Transformer network model, further combined with fractal geometry technology, inductive bias lacking in Transformer is introduced from the perspective of translation invariance and locality, and the dynamic texture generation method of digital media art combined with fractal geometry and Transformer model is formed in this paper. Experimental results show that the application of translation invariance and locality can increase the ODS, OIS and AP indexes by 17.17%, 27.72% and 25.38%, respectively. In the self-built Miao pattern data set, this method can generate dynamic texture features of Miao culture and art more completely and clearly. At the same time, this paper can create digital media art for Miao embroidery patterns through the generated results of this method, and improve the audience influence and satisfaction of intangible cultural heritage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207