Research on the Construction of Labor Education Curriculum Model Based on Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm under Fuzzy Cognitive Orientation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optimization problems usually involve multiple objectives, while fuzzy cognitive maps can effectively show the causal relationship between concepts, and the combination of the two can greatly advance the development of the education field. In this paper, we design a fuzzy cognition-based knowledge map for labor education courses and a multi-objective optimization model for labor education courses to optimize learners’ learning paths and recommend personalized exercises from multiple stages. Through teaching experiments and regression analysis, the teaching effect of the multi-objective optimization algorithm in labor education courses is evaluated. This paper borrows the k-means algorithm to classify learners into four clusters, and the algorithm provides learning path optimization for different clusters of learners in labor education courses. The exercise recommendation accuracy of this paper’s algorithm ranges from 0.91 to 0.97 and has better novelty and diversity recommendation performance. In the experimental class in the fuzzy cognitively oriented multi-objective optimization labor course, the learners’ labor scores improve faster and are about 3.8 points higher than those of the traditional teaching, and the regression results show that this paper’s model has a positive and positive effect on the teaching effect. The average satisfaction scores of this paper’s model in labor education courses for the friendliness of teaching aid, effectiveness of cognitive diagnosis method, usefulness of path optimization, and reasonableness of personalized recommendation of exercises are above 4.3, indicating that the model has practical application value in labor education courses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".