Analysis of Micromechanical Behavior and Adaptive Optimization Algorithm for High Performance Concrete with Complex Mineral Admixtures for Bridges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extreme high temperature and erosive environment service environment in bridge construction puts forward higher requirements for high performance concrete and other aspects of performance. In this paper, compound mineral admixture is selected as a research breakthrough, and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy are used to explore the micromechanical behavior of compound mineral admixture in high-performance concrete. In the Raman spectral analysis, the stress distribution of the fitted curve of the compound mineral admixture is more flat and uniform, and the offset of the G’ peak position is higher than that of the reference concrete and the single-mineral-admixture concrete, and the stress can reach 2.5 MPa under 1% strain, showing good interfacial bond, stress transfer efficiency, etc. The physical phase data of the XRD also shows the frost resistance of compound mineral admixture, with the ability to mitigate carbon dioxide, and the ability to reduce the carbon footprint of the concrete, with the ability to reduce the carbon dioxide. The XRD data also show the frost resistance of the compound mineral admixture, which has the performance of slowing down carbonization. The NSGA-II algorithm is introduced and improved to propose a concrete proportion optimization model. The final evaluation function converges from 35 generations and the final value is 0.4558, which achieves the adaptive optimization of compound mineral admixture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".