MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409576546 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-103

An investigation of algorithmic simulation efficiency of BIM synergistic green new energy fire protection technology in high-rise building water supply and drainage system design

2025· article· en· W4409576546 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xinyan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectural engineeringEfficient energy useDrainageEnvironmental scienceDrainage system (geomorphology)Civil engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The steady development of economy makes the number of high-rise buildings increasing, and the water supply and drainage system becomes an important part of high-rise building construction. The purpose of this paper is to explore the drainage efficiency and fire fighting efficiency of BIM and green new energy in water supply and drainage system. Revit Mep software is mainly used to design the fire fighting module in the drainage system of high-rise buildings by combining BIM technology and new energy. A simulation mathematical model of water supply and drainage efficiency (including fluid control equations, etc.) was designed, and simulation experiments were conducted on the fire treatment efficiency of green new energy fire protection technology. The investigators’ ratings of the evaluation indexes of the water supply and drainage system design of BIM synergistic green new energy fire protection technology ranged from 4.06 to 4.54, indicating the feasibility of the approach. When the building floor is 25 floors, the water supply and drainage efficiency of the system in this paper is 80.45% and 84.52%, respectively. The fire fighting simulation experiment shows that the green new energy fire fighting technology integrating BIM can reduce the temperature of the room to 200~500℃ in 5 minutes. In the experiment, the method can extinguish the fire quickly and the residual concentration of smoke after extinguishing can be reduced to the normal range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207