SysQuan: Repurposing SILAC Mice for the Cost-Effective Absolute Quantitation of the Human Proteome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relative quantitation, used by most mass spectrometry-based proteomics laboratories to determine protein fold-changes, requires samples being processed and analyzed together for best comparability through minimizing batch differences. This limits the adoption of mass spectrometry-based proteomics in population-wide studies and the detection of subtle but relevant changes in heterogeneous samples. Absolute quantitation circumvents these limitations and enables comparison of results across laboratories, studies, and over time. However, high cost of the essential stable isotope labeled (SIL) standards prevents widespread access and limits the number of quantifiable proteins. Our new approach, called "SysQuan", repurposes SILAC mouse tissues/biofluids as system-wide internal standards for matched human samples to enable absolute quantitation of, theoretically, two-thirds of the human proteome using 157,086 shared tryptic peptides, of which 73,901 with lysine on the c terminus. We demonstrate that SysQuan enables quantification of 70% and 31% of the liver and plasma proteomes, respectively. We demonstrate for 14 metabolic proteins that abundant SIL mouse tissues enable cost-effective reverse absolute quantitation in, theoretically, 1000s of human samples. Moreover, 10,000s of light/heavy doublets in untargeted SysQuan datasets enable unique postacquisition absolute quantitation. SysQuan empowers researchers to replace relative quantitation with affordable absolute quantitation at scale, making data comparable across laboratories, diseases and tissues, enabling completely novel study designs and increasing reusability of data in repositories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".