Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms in Tourism Planning and Emergency Management and Their Application to Resource Allocation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
China’s tourism industry has become a strategic pillar industry in China, playing an important role in developing the economy and providing employment. Therefore, how can we avoid or reduce the hazards of tourism emergencies and give full play to the development advantages that tourism brings to the city has become the focus of this paper. In this paper, the objective function is used to construct a two-stage stochastic optimization model without opportunity constraints to minimize the partial cost of the first stage and the expected total cost of the second stage. Considering the problem of maximizing the utilization rate of emergency shelters in tourist attractions, the opportunity constraint model is introduced to help decision makers allocate resources reasonably. Based on the center siting cost and vehicle distribution cost, a mixed integer nonlinear objective function model is constructed and the model is solved using the improved ant colony algorithm. Seven emergency management simulation scenarios are set up to analyze the effect of emergency management by combining simulation and empirical research. The experimental results show that among the emergencies at all levels of the sites in Y scenic area in the past 5 years, the number of level 2 emergencies is the highest, and the average number of emergencies occurred in each site in the past 5 years is 7.48. According to the model’s solution of the site selection results, the emergency center A covers 5 distribution warehouses, and the emergency center B covers 10 distribution warehouses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".