Research on Algorithm Optimization and Application in Intelligent Class Scheduling System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the overall demand analysis of intelligent class scheduling system, this paper determines the overall structural design scheme of intelligent class scheduling system, and realizes the intelligent class scheduling system using software development language. Aiming at the problems of overfitting and easy to fall into the local optimum of the benchmark genetic algorithm, the adaptive genetic algorithm optimization in the intelligent scheduling system is realized through the nonlinearization of the fitness function, the crossover operator, and the variational operator. Determine the experimental environment and set up groups (experimental group and control group) to evaluate the optimization performance of the algorithm and the application effect of the system. The program based on Improved Adaptive Genetic Algorithm (IAGA) (class time distribution balance: 0.79) is 0.23 higher than the program based on Adaptive Genetic Algorithm (AGA) (class time distribution balance: 0.56) in terms of class time distribution balance, and IAGA algorithm is more effective and superior in solving the problem of class scheduling in colleges and universities as compared to AGA algorithm. This system can reduce the heavy workload of teaching affairs, and also solve the scheduling difficulties of colleges and universities in the case of teacher shortage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it