MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409579969 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-052

Study on the Problems and Countermeasures of the Development of Aviation Core Industry to Promote the Construction of Airside Economy in Henan Province Based on Entropy Weight Method and Grey Situation Decision-making

2025· article· en· W4409579969 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuchen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSafety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAviationEntropy (arrow of time)BusinessCore (optical fiber)Industrial organizationEconomyEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the trend of economic globalization continues to develop, air transport, as a fast and convenient mode of transportation, is playing an increasingly important role in economic development. This study analyzes the driving force of airside economic construction from four levels: primary influence, secondary influence, derivative influence and permanent influence. It also analyz es the dynamic relationship between the aviation industry and the construction of airside economy. In order to further research on the development of airside economic construction, this paper uses the entropy weight method to optimize the gray situation de cision making theory, and conducts research on the development and countermeasures of airside economic construction in Henan Province. According to the gray decision making effect measurement calculation, it is known that the key construction area of airsi de economy in Henan Province should be selected as H2 area, with the effect measurement score of 0.9789, the highest value. The economic effect achieved by prioritizing the development of tertiary industry or the joint development of secondary and tertiary industries in the construction of airside economy in the H2 area is the highest, with the effect measurement scores of 0.755 and 0.749, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicSafety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207