MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409580660 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc127a-080

Research on clustering and co-regulation of virtual power plant resources based on machine learning

2025· article· en· W4409580660 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yingying Sun, Zhimin Li, Yanyan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to realize the strategic goal of environmental protection and low carbon, designing a set of resource clustering and regulation strategies that take into account energy saving and operating costs has become a research challenge for virtual power plants. In this study, the ICEEMDAN-CNN-SSDAE hybrid model is used to realize high-precision prediction of electricity price and load data in virtual power plants. The objective function and constraints of resource clustering and cooperative regulation of virtual power plants are established under the condition of demand response, and solved by Markov process. Finally, the virtual power plant resource clustering and co-regulation model is constructed on the basis of the deep reinforcement learning model framework by combining the prediction model and objective function. The results show that the ICEEMDAN-CNN-SSDAE model proposed in this paper can guarantee high prediction speed (0.062s and 0.059s) while having high prediction accuracy. It is also found that the average capacity of the output power of each component in the virtual power plant system after the model clusters and optimizes the regulation of a virtual power plant resources increases by 0.535-0.686 MW/h compared with the pre-optimization period, and the economic efficiency and energy utilization are also improved to different degrees. The research in this paper verifies the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed model, and provides certain theoretical basis and guidance method for virtual power plant resource clustering and cooperative scheduling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial ComputingSame topicAdvanced Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207