MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409581518 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3562327

Multi-Objective Regular Mapping QoS Path Planning for Mega LEO Constellation Networks

2025· article· en· W4409581518 on OpenAlexaff
Ye Fan, Rugui Yao, Hao Jiang, Jialong Shi, Yang Xu, Xiaoya Zuo, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChengdu Science and Technology ProgramFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConstellationQuality of serviceComputer scienceComputer networkPath (computing)Motion planningMega-Real-time computingTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To guarantee the low-congestion performance and quality of service (QoS) requirements of multi-services in Mega Low Earth Orbit Constellation Networks (MLEOCN), this paper focuses on the comprehensive communication link model in MLEOCN, commencing from users to access satellites, relayed by relay satellites, and finally delivered to the gateway by feeder satellites. Aiming at the problems of high congestion and low throughput in traditional path planning algorithms, we innovatively propose a multi-objective optimization service-correlated path optimization algorithm based on stochastic hill climbing strategy (MSCPO-SHCS). The algorithm initially achieves the joint optimization of three metrics through regular mapping and judicious weighting. Subsequently, it assesses the interplane hop via geometric parameter theory analysis (GPTA), then decouples the large-scale mixed integer optimization problem into the integer optimization problem superimposed linear programming problem, and ultimately employs the stochastic hill climbing strategy (SHCS) for path intelligent optimization. Based on the path Gaussianity assumption, we theoretically prove and numerically verify the convergence of the proposed algorithm. The simulation results indicate that the proposed algorithm boosts the throughput and load balancing coefficient compared with the greedy strategy, service-uncorrelated, minimum hop count, and resource allocation optimization. Additionally, it decreases the hop count compared with the maximum throughput and maximum balancing coefficient and maintains the optimal overall performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207