A Multi-Objective Optimisation Algorithm Based Design Method for Integrating Direct-Flex Photovoltaic Systems with Buildings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the development of renewable energy technology and the pursuit of sustainable development in the construction industry, the design of direct-soft photovoltaic systems integrated with buildings has become an important research direction. In this paper, a variety of photovoltaic power generation modules are selected and combined with building roof functions to design a solar photovoltaic building integration system. In addition, this paper constructs a multi-objective optimization configuration model, improves the multi-objective particle swarm algorithm, and analyzes the optimization effect of the improved particle swarm algorithm on the photovoltaic building integration system by using multiple sets of test functions and evaluation indexes, combined with a number of experiments. The improved particle swarm algorithm in this paper converges to the optimal value of 0.21 when iterating to 25 rounds. And with the increase of the number of nodes, the optimized particle swarm algorithm, the distribution of node voltages in the vicinity of the standard voltage. The PV building integrated system designed in this paper still has a generation output efficiency higher than 85% after 20 years, which shows good stability of power generation. And the power generation in its whole life cycle is about 1645710kwh, which greatly reduces the consumption of conventional energy. In conclusion, the PV building integrated system in this paper not only has significant advantages in terms of capacity efficiency, but also shows strong potential for environmental protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".