Scoring System Model for Early Detection of Maternity Blues in Bukittinggi, West Sumatera, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Maternity blues creates emotional instability in moms, causing them to become irritated, overly nervous, and feel incapable of being a good mother. Maternity blues may interfere with infant care and raise the risk of postpartum depression symptoms, disrupting mother and baby interactions. Maternity blues is often ignored so it is not diagnosed and if not treated properly it can become a problem and develop into postpartum depression or postpartum psychosis. Maternity blues is a serious condition that poses risks to both mothers and infants. If left untreated, Maternity blues can progress into postpartum depression, which has significant physical and psychological consequences. Early detection of Maternity blues is crucial for timely intervention and prevention. Objectives: This study aims to develop a Scoring System Model for the early detection of maternity blues , allowing for effective screening and timely management. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Bukittinggi City, West Sumatra, Indonesia, involving 126 postpartum mothers recruited consecutively. Data analysis included the calculation of odds ratios, logistic regression, and ROC curve analysis to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the prediction model. The scoring system's performance was assessed using calibration and discrimination values. Results: The developed scoring system demonstrated good calibration and discrimination, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.806 (95% CI: 0.732–0.881). The Hosmer & Leme show test showed a p-value of 0.724, indicating a good fit for the model. Conclusion: The proposed scoring system is a reliable tool for the early detection of maternity blues . By identifying at-risk mothers through prediction scores, appropriate interventions can be implemented to prevent the progression of maternity blues into more severe postpartum mental health disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".